It's unclear whether Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg ever climbed into the cage for their much-hyped MMA showdown, which began as a bizarre tech-bro challenge on social media in June 2023. While the physical bout remains speculative, the metaphorical and corporate duel between these two tech titans has played out on a much larger stage—and it's Musk who seems to have Zuckerberg locked in a submission hold so tight, some have dubbed him "Musk's Mini-Me."
[I was thrilled to guest co-host on The Five 8 (@thefive8.substack.com) this week with Greg Olear (gregolear.substack.com) and Stephanie LB (@lincolnsbible)]
Here’s a clip where we discuss everything about Meta except Zuckerberg’s perm:
Musk's Submission Hold
Over the past year, Zuckerberg has begun to mirror Musk's polarizing, thin-skinned, and chaotic approach to leadership. From dismantling Meta's fact-checking infrastructure to embracing AI-generated content and "community fact-checking," Zuckerberg has seemingly abandoned his cautious rhetoric about creating safe, reliable platforms. These moves align strikingly with Musk's gutting of Twitter aka X, where misinformation thrives under algorithmic amplification.
The clearest sign of Zuckerberg's capitulation came with Meta's announcement to eliminate its fact-checking operations and relocate oversight teams to Texas, a state with a regulatory climate that appeals to tech libertarians. Critics see this as a symbolic nod to Musk's influence, as Zuckerberg adopts policies that echo Musk's playbook of prioritizing engagement over accountability.
A War of Wits—or Just Wills?
The rivalry between these two billionaires once reflected at least publicly divergent visions for the future of tech. Under scrutiny after Facebook enabled election interference through Cambridge Analytica's microtargeting of unwitting users, Zuckerberg's Meta promised to focus on algorithmic curation and expanding the Metaverse, while Musk leaned into chaos, amplifying divisive figures and railing against so-called "wokeness."
But as Zuckerberg increasingly follows Musk's lead, the distinctions between the two have blurred. From imitating Musk's "community notes" moderation system to allowing unverified AI personas to overrun Meta's platforms, Zuckerberg appears to be less innovator and more imitator. Whether his actions stem from strategy or survival is up for debate.
Musk's Mini-Me?
Zuckerberg's transformation isn't just policy-driven—it's also about image. Musk has crafted himself as a provocateur unafraid of controversy, while Zuckerberg, long caricatured as Silicon Valley's detached "robot overlord," now seems to be chasing relevance. His dismissive remarks about critics being "woke" or "virtue signaling" echo Musk's anti-establishment rhetoric, further solidifying his role as Musk's understudy.
Perhaps the most revealing element of this transformation stems from an entirely pettier source: his outrage over a Facebook algorithm that didn't show enough sympathy for his ACL surgery post.
Zuckerberg's Knee and the End of Fact-Checking
In November 2023, Zuckerberg shared a post about tearing his ACL during MMA training and undergoing surgery. When the post failed to gain traction due to Facebook's algorithm limiting engagement with health-related content, Zuckerberg's frustration reportedly hit a boiling point. This minor grievance escalated into a full-scale review of Meta's content policies. Critics argue that this tantrum—a personal affront masked as a principled stand against "censorship"—ultimately led to the dismantling of Meta's fact-checking program.
Zuckerberg framed the decision as a pivot toward "free expression," conveniently aligning with the Trump administration's anti-moderation stance. Meta replaced its fact-checking program with a "Community Notes" system akin to Musk's model, despite expert warnings about its ineffectiveness in combating misinformation. This shift has been widely criticized as prioritizing personal grievances and political appeasement over the public's need for accurate information.
A Future Match?
While we may never know if Musk and Zuckerberg faced off in the cage, one thing is clear: Zuckerberg's retreat in the corporate arena represents a stunning capitulation. Even more striking is how this shift was partially triggered by personal pettiness over insufficient engagement on his knee injury post. As Meta plunges further into unregulated chaos, the true submission hold appears to be Zuckerberg's willingness to sacrifice integrity for personal and political expediency. In an era of climate change-driven catastrophes—from hurricanes in Florida to cataclysmic flooding in North Carolina to apocalyptic fires consuming Los Angeles—social media platforms that should guide people toward reliable, life-saving information have instead become sewers of lies and weaponized anxiety. In this battle of tech titans, the real casualty is the truth.
The tech bros are plunging us all into this unregulated chaos, as accelerants to the decades of rightwing propaganda that has churned out nonstop lies and attacks. They’ve pushed the Overton window so far right that the most mainstream, innocuous ideas are now seen as the woke, leftist agenda. Worse, people live in those media & socially isolated bubbles, eschewing any and all information not fed to them on those channels. Our monumental challenge is how do we begin to break through the infrastructure of lies in a way that will actually be heard by a wider audience?
For me this points to all the more reason for people to engage and act locally- and develop their inner guidance because the external has become increasingly unreliable.